Showing posts with label OPS. Show all posts
Showing posts with label OPS. Show all posts

Saturday, November 15, 2014

I no longer ....

I found this quote by author Jose Micard Teixeira and thought it stands very much on its own as a blog post .... it sums up well where I am at now that I have more days behind me than I have in front of me ...

“I no longer have patience for certain things, not because I’ve become arrogant, but simply because I reached a point in my life where I do not want to waste more time with what displeases me or hurts me. I have no patience for cynicism, excessive criticism and demands of any nature. I lost the will to please those who do not like me, to love those who do not love me and to smile at those who do not want to smile at me.

I no longer spend a single minute on those who lie or want to manipulate. I decided not to coexist any more with pretense, hypocrisy, dishonesty and cheap praise. I do not tolerate selective erudition nor academic arrogance. I do not adjust either to popular gossiping. I hate conflict and comparisons. I believe in a world of opposites and that’s why I avoid people with rigid and inflexible personalities. In friendship I dislike the lack of loyalty and betrayal. I do not get along with those who do not know how to give a compliment or a word of encouragement. Exaggerations bore me and I have difficulty accepting those who do not like animals. And on top of everything I have no patience for anyone who does not deserve my patience.”

- José Micard Teixeira


Obviously if I believe in these statements which I do, I am not a politician.  I am a person who wants the best for people and has a deep desire to get on with it.  Why waste the time I have doing anything else?

All the best
Jim

Friday, November 14, 2014

Guest blogger AMAPCEO Director Theresa Anderson Butcher: Engaging the Membership An Argument for Adequate Resourcing of the Chapter Executives Part 2 of 2

This is a continuation of Theresa Anderson-Butchers blog post on Membership Engagement.  You can read part 1 here

Moving Forward – How to Address the Gaps

How many of you saw benefit last year with the resources we allocated to mobilization? Was there better engagement of our members? Did we get value for those expenditures? Did our members provide positive feedback on our efforts and those of staff?

Do you believe, as I do, that maintaining a higher level of funding and providing more leave to Chapter Executives to engage and educate members would reap a positive benefit?

Let’s look at this more practically. I am going to make some assumptions as follows:

1.     AMAPCEO staff is responsible for the preparation of all training and communications materials.
2.     Each chapter has full access to a teleconference line to conduct Chapter Executive meetings.
3.     Leave time for chapter business can be allocated to any members of the Chapter Executive Committee.
4.     Leave time can be requested on a more flexible schedule based on sufficient notice to the employer.
5.     The Chapter Executive puts together an annual plan for outreach and member engagement. The plan can be template and then adapted for individual chapter needs.

Regardless of chapter size, number of members or geography, both time and resources will be required for appropriate outreach. For example, a regional chapter represents a smaller population, but covers a larger geography; a ministry chapter represents a larger population over a smaller geography. Are the costs the same to engage members equally? I would say that they’re close but spent on different items. For example, higher refreshment/meeting room costs for ministry chapters, and higher travel and teleconference/videoconference costs for regional chapters.

If we can allocate leave time to Chapter Executives, the travel time for regional chapters could be significantly reduced allowing Executive members closest to the membership to engage as opposed to having the Chapter Chair travel longer distances. This would be the same for ministry chapters as well.

It takes time and resources to build and engaged membership. We have four years before the next OPS collective agreement is negotiated. This is the largest population of members and we need to use the time between now and then to build engagement and a sense of community within the membership. We need to provide the resources to do so.

If you truly want an engaged membership and if you truly want to be supported by the Association so you can personally more actively engage, then I ask you to vote for those candidates who are committed to giving you the resources we need to make sure every member, if they choose to become more active in the Association, is able to meaningfully engage regardless of their geographic location, family status or accommodation needs.

We cannot allow the continuance of systemic barriers that prevent members from engaging with each other or participating in the leadership of the Association should they choose.

If this is a concept you would like to see explored, built upon and implemented, please vote for candidates like James Dawson, Dianne Colville and Theresa Anderson-Butcher who are committed to making this happen.

Friday, February 28, 2014

Demanding a fair wage based on Market Studies

I have to confess a bias right from the start.  I work in Information Technology and confess to writing my first computer program using both mark-sense cards and a key-punch machine at the tender age of 16.  I'll let you all do the math to guess my age.  Nevertheless one could say that I've been working within Information Technology for a while.  During the time that I've worked in the Information Technology Industry I've seen enormous change.  I've also seen the enormous and almost invisible impact that Information Technology has on our daily lives.  I say almost invisible because it is ubiquitous it is everywhere and seen nowhere.  Even if we hold it in the palm of our hands we fail to see that it was innovation within the Information Technology industry that allows us to speak to people thousands and thousands of kilometres away as if they were standing right next to you or perform intensive computational feats beyond the scale of any computing platform that I learnt on. 

That ubiquitousness is very much a plus to the public but it is also very much a minus to information technology workers in the OPS.  While we all accept and embrace the use of information technologies in our everyday lives, the public fails to understand or value,  the knowledge, training, and talent that goes into making all that possible.

It would appear too that the Employer also fails to understand that all of its services and programs available to the public and the bureaucracy are there because of information technology, because of the decades of accumulated knowledge, the years of training, the information strategies and architectures that provide the planning foundation for the millions upon millions of lines of software code written by a highly intelligent -- and mobile workforce.  That workforce, especially when there is an uptick in the economy and the private sector decides to spend money, are quickly courted and romanced with generous bonuses and benefits. 

The Employer seems to have forgotten the real value of the Information Technology worker to its ability to implement policies and provide services to the people of Ontario or even to the day to day running of government.  Otherwise why would it force below market salaries onto its information technology workers and risk alienating them.  Is it arrogance or ignorance?  

During the last Collective Agreement information technology workers and their contribution and importance to the delivery of services to the public and the bureaucracy was  disrespected and disregarded by the Employer when AMAPCEO was forced to concede to a set of pay levels based on what is now widely regarded as an incompetently implemented job evaluation system. For comparative purposes I am including a excerpt from the salary scale under which information technology workers are graded and paid.   

I have also included a table from a salary guide report authored by a very influential and respected company that regularly comments on, amongst other things, the salary outlooks for workers across many business sectors and regions. But first is the pay scales imposed by the Employer during the last round of bargaining. Most AMAPCEO represented technology workers fall into the level 6 category with a handful of outliers falling into level 7.

Government of Ontario IT 2013 Salary Guide
Classification Levels               2013



5  $64,605  $  90,300
6  $69,680  $  99,600
7  $75,000  $105,740
8  $85,000  $116,210


You can see for yourself how ridiculously low the Employer compensates information technology workers compared to what those information technology workers could be paid in the private sector.

Robert Half Technology 2014 Salary Guide
Job Title             2013                     2014 % Change
Database Manager $96,500 $129,250 $102,000 $136,500 5.8%
Database Developer $77,500 $109,250 $  82,750 $116,500 6.7%
Database Administrator $77,000 $105,000 $  81,000 $110,500 5.2%
Data Analyst/Report Writer $68,750 $  94,500 $  72,250 $  99,250 5.1%
Data Architect $97,250 $132,750 $104,000 $142,000 7.0%
Data Modeler $81,250 $110,500 $  85,750 $116,750 5.6%
Data Warehouse Manager $93,750 $126,500 $  99,250 $133,750 5.8%
Data Warehouse Analyst $86,000 $117,000 $  91,000 $123,750 5.8%
Business Intelligence Analyst $76,000 $105,750 $  81,750 $113,750 7.6%
Portal Administrator  $68,000 $  92,500 $  71,500 $  97,250 5.1%
Quality Assurance (QA) & Testing (c)
ONTesting Manager $76,750 $102,750 $  80,500 $107,750 4.9%
QA Associate/Analyst  $64,500 $  90,250 $  67,250 $  94,250 4.4%
Internet & E-Commerce (d)
Senior Web Developer $84,750 $109,500 $  89,750 $116,000 5.9%
Web Developer $62,000 $  89,750 $  65,750 $  95,250 6.1%
Web Administrator $62,250 $  81,750 $  64,500 $  84,500 3.5%
Web Designer $65,250 $  90,000 $  69,000 $  95,250 5.8%
Electronic Data Interchange (ED I) Specialist $66,250 $  92,000 $  69,750 $  96,750 5.2%
E-Commerce Analyst $66,000 $  94,750 $  69,750 $100,250 5.8%
Messaging Administrator $63,500 $  80,000 $  67,000 $  84,500 5.6%

Now in the current round of negotiations the Employer will place even more pressure on the Association to keep the salaries scales where they are, to trim back your benefits to a point where they are laughable, and to NOT provide any merit incentives to even employees deemed “fully effective” by their managers. Under this proposal, only those that the Employer deems to be the very highest performers would be rewarded with a merit increase, reduced from current levels. Moreover, the Employer is pushing to eliminate the majority of your current paramedical provisions, and drastically reduce the eligible drugs the plan will pay for.

Meanwhile, private sector information technology workers enjoy market rate salaries, pay for performance bonuses, good health-care benefits, and year-end bonuses that number in the thousands of dollars or tens of thousands of dollars.  All the while you are stuck at a below market salary.

Should you be angry with the Employer's attempt to decimate your benefits package, and to continue to again freeze your salary -- up to you but I am mad as hell and am not going to take it!  Make your voice heard and your presence felt!

Post the AMAPCEO posters and fly the AMAPCEO flag at your desk, Wear the AMAPCEO lanyard and badges to meetings.  Make the employer aware that you too are as mad as hell and aren't going to take it any more.  You gave at the office last time! 

If you have any questions and comments about bargaining direct them to opsbargaining@amapceo.on.ca